fbpx
Connect with us
Advertisement

Politics & Security

[All Politics is Global] Why a 'Quad-Ex' JME Would Bolster Indo-Pacific Security

With the US shifting its focus away from Asia, "Quad-Ex" joint drills could bolster confidence among Quad nations and allies, enhancing Indo-Pacific security.

Published

on

US President Joe Biden, Australia's Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, Japan's Prime Minister Fumio Kishida and India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi hold a Quad meeting on the sidelines of the G7 summit, at the Grand Prince Hotel in Hiroshima, Japan, May 20, 2023. (© REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst/Pool)

The last-minute cancellation of the latest Quad meeting, scheduled in Australia, could not have come at a worse time. The unavailability of the United States President was the reason for the cancellation.

The imperious reason for this was cutting a deal with Congressional leaders to avert an impending US debt default. However, in all, the Biden administration's focus on security priorities in Asia is seemingly taking a backseat, given Washington's attention and focus on the war of attrition in Ukraine.

Washington's strategy of bleeding Russia in Ukraine seeks to weaken Moscow. But it is bound to have a recoil effect on the United States too. All through the Russia-Ukraine conflict, it is China that would not have wanted it any other way. Beijing understandably would like to see American preeminence and the US-led alliance system deeply sapped in the Ukraine imbroglio. This is because it would keep US attention away from the Indo-Pacific. China wants American prospects to consequently dwindle to the extent that a future Taiwan annexation scenario in China's wargaming plan creates a new Asian order (if not global) led by Beijing.

The Relevance and Future of Quad

Besides, it is not just America's priorities, but the very basis of the Quad that is coming into question. The Biden administration's Indo-Pacific strategy has increasingly been focusing on global non-traditional challenges such as climate change. But these were never a part of the original charter of the Quad's core objectives. 

The Quad comprises India, the United States, Japan, and Australia. And it was heralded as the cornerstone of Indo-Pacific's security and stability in strict traditional security terminology — until AUKUS happened. 

Today, the Quad finds itself relegated primarily to handling non-traditional security agendas such as global health and climate change.

AUKUS is the new enhanced trilateral security partnership between Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States announced in September 2021. Since its birth, comparisons on the efficacy of networks of partnerships in the Indo-Pacific region have gained momentum. Perhaps, the most notable one is the relevance, significance, and future of Quad.

Advertisement
An AUKUS joint exercise to practice responding to an invasion at the Narashino Training Area of the Japan Ground Self-Defense Force in Chiba Prefecture, Japan, on January 8, 2023. (© Getty Images via Kyodo)

China's Strategized Focus

The greatest shortcoming of the AUKUS framework is that it is a security net that, professedly, has been designed to checkmate a revisionist Asian giant — China. Yet, an Indo-Pacific security alliance without any Asian partner nation or organization as a founding member seems unplumbed. Asia is heading towards a crystallizing classification of traditional and non-traditional security challenges, marked by a division between AUKUS and the Quad.

China's belligerent Asia strategy of late has centered on hardcore realpolitik and militarization. The "raucous rise" of Beijing will strengthen predictions of a glaring power contest. A contest that has Beijing's complete strategized focus. On the other hand, the US is seemingly reordering its priorities vis-à-vis Ukraine. And the Quad is already at a crossroads. 

This reality underscores the susceptibility of America's Asian partners on many other key frontiers. The US, a preeminent power of the last century, finds itself at the strategic crossroads directly at odds with China in four key hotspots. These are the South China Sea, East China Sea, Taiwan Strait, and Korean Peninsula. Moreover, Washington has apparent constraints on engagement in them all.

US Credibility in Asia

Joe Biden has been rather inaccurate in his assessment of China throughout his political career. He appears to have enhanced the security chaos in Asia. This is especially against the backdrop of the United States' desultory exit from Afghanistan, and now the involvement in Ukraine (and European security through that). In terms of realpolitik, the US lead in Asia is not becoming established in lucid terms. This lends momentum to the debate surrounding Washington's relative waning on the global political scene.

Without any tangible, action-backed pushback, whether it be from AUKUS or the Quad, the United States' primary 21st-century challenger, China, will only be further emboldened.

Amid these rumblings of an American credibility crisis vis-à-vis its alliance commitments to its allies and partners across Asia, US Secretary of Defense, Lloyd J Austin III has announced his plan to visit Japan, Singapore, India, and France beginning the week of May 29. This would be Austin's seventh trip to the Indo-Pacific region. It will begin in Tokyo where he will meet with Japanese Defense Minister, Yasukazu Hamada. He will also visit US troops stationed in Japan.

Taiwan
Customers in Beijing dine near a giant screen broadcasting combat readiness patrol and "Joint Sword" exercises around Taiwan by the Eastern Theatre Command of China's PLA. April 10, 2023. (© REUTERS/Tingshu Wang)

A 'Quad-Ex' JME Grouping

Perhaps it is time for the Quad to formalize a flagship "Quad-Ex" Joint Military Exercise (JME) grouping for the Indo-Pacific. This move shall quell any rumblings of an American credibility crisis regarding its commitments to its allies and partners across Asia. Besides, it will reinforce the original charter and objectives of the Quad grouping. It shall also assure Asia that eventually, democratic nations and voices shall prevail in Asia, and beyond.

An announcement of the flagship "Quad-Ex" would also be an excellent cooperative confidence-building measure (CBM) for regional security among the Quad nations and their allies and partners. They would have a commonality of interests to protect the security within their joint spheres of interest. The "Quad-Ex" JME is an idea whose time has come.


RELATED:


Author: Dr Monika ChansoriaDr
Monika Chansoria is a Senior Fellow at The Japan Institute of International Affairs in Tokyo and the author of five books on Asian security. The views expressed here are those of the author and do not reflect the views of any organization with which the author is affiliated. Follow her column, "All Politics is Global" on JAPAN Forward, and on Twitter @MonikaChansoria.

Advertisement

Our Partners