Recent HEAC forums engaged various perspectives in the debate on Ramseyer and Morgan's book, "The Comfort Women Hoax."
The Tiananmen Square protests followed a long tradition in Asia but the violent clampdown on academic freedom and open public debate keeps its wounds fresh.
In a liberal democracy, citizens should engage more viewpoints, not less. You are invited to join two online forums on May 31 and June 14.
Durable international ties depend on shared values and material interests, and for democracies, the foundation of such is ultimately individual liberty.
Critics from democratic countries should support academic freedom in Hong Kong, not by isolating it but by engaging with it even more, the author argues.
In a forum designed for open discussion of diverse viewpoints, three gay Christian foreign teachers share the challenges of living in South Korean society.
Bilateral relations are better, but the comfort women issue remains divisive within and between Japan and South Korea. Allowing open debate is the way forward.
To find the truth about the comfort women, there must be critical, fact-based discussion from different perspectives, say participants in a recent online event.
In a liberal democracy, we should debate, not demonize, our opponents. You're invited to join an online event on June 2, "Comfort Women Scholars On Trial."
The author argues that strengthening Western democracies, instead of constraining China by restricting the liberties of Chinese individuals, is a better path.
Humanitarian assistance and measured loosening of sanctions, the author argues, will help North Koreans survive and physically change North Korea from within.
South Korea has had tortured relations with Pyongyang and Tokyo. The author discusses them and offers suggestions on some complex factors behind the problem.
