Comfort Women Symposium Opens Up Research, Debate from Three Regions 

The third International Comfort Women Symposium was held in Tokyo on July 10. Bringing together scholars from Japan, South Korea, and the United States, it delved into one of East Asia's most contentious historical issues. 

Discussions focused on the historical perspectives surrounding the comfort women across economic, legal, and cultural dimensions. In the backdrop were calls for historical accuracy and diplomatic reconciliation. Encouraging international dialogue, the symposium stressed the need to understand sensitive historical legacies. The outcome illuminated the profound impacts of wartime experiences on national identities and contemporary geopolitics.

Diplomatic Failings and Misinformation

In his lecture, Professor Tsutomu Nishioka conveyed the intricate and enduring significance of the historical controversy surrounding the comfort women. He underscored its contemporary relevance stating, "The issue transcends mere historical inquiry, remaining a pressing contemporary challenge." 

Nishioka critically evaluated the Japanese government’s approach to historical recognition and its diplomatic responses. He emphasized, "Its efforts often fall short in addressing historical truths and meeting international standards." Nishioka also lamented the global dissemination of false narratives about Japan by "anti-Japanese activists." This, he stated, has significantly tarnished the country's international reputation.

Addressing media influence, Nishioka analyzed the impact of misinformation. He noted, "Until 1982, the South Korean government did not utilize historical issues in diplomacy, contrary to popular belief." 

He further cautioned against oversimplified judgments. "It is problematic to judge the past solely through today's values," he argued. Evidence-based approaches in confronting historical distortions are important he urged, adding that "Responses should be anchored in factual accuracy."

Agency and Market Dynamics

Professor Yoshitaka Fukui, a professor at Aoyama Gakuin University, presented a thought-provoking perspective on the comfort women issue. He advocated examining its complexities through economic and historical lenses. 

"Economics provides a systematic framework to comprehend human actions without inherently moralizing," he proposed. "Its emphasis lies in the precise application of methodologies and rational explanations rather than moral evaluations." 

Furthermore, he points out that market dynamics during wartime significantly influenced decisions and outcomes related to the comfort women issue. "Numerous transactions in the wartime market set price standards, which directly impacted subsequent decisions," Fukui highlighted. His insights challenge simplistic moral assessments, emphasizing instead how perceptions of the comfort women system have changed over time. 

"Good intentions do not always lead to favorable outcomes, nor do bad intentions necessarily result in negative consequences," Fukui elaborated.

Shaping South Korean Nationalism

Dr Lee Young-hoon illuminated critical historical dynamics and their lasting imprint on South Korean society. "The comfort women issue has been a potent catalyst shaping South Korean nationalism and identity since its democratization," he emphasized. 

He underscored the profound impact of Japan's colonial rule from 1910 to 1945. "This period of Japanese governance left an indelible mark on Korea's socio-political fabric," he asserted. Lee explored the political responses to collaboration with the Japanese Empire, highlighting significant social disruptions. He noted that "the formation of a special investigation committee in 1949 represented initial steps toward addressing wartime collaboration." 

However, Lee highlighted President Syngman Rhee's cautious approach. He noted, "During Rhee's presidency, delicate handling of Japanese collaboration issues was crucial to maintain anti-communist unity." 

These historical events, he maintained, shaped South Korea's pragmatic political framework. "Pragmatic politics prioritized national interests over nationalist fervor, facilitating economic growth,” he observed.

However, Lee underscores that issues like the comfort women and conscripted workers have galvanized Korean society since democratization in 1988, fueling "heightened Korean hostility toward Japan." Critiquing past administrations, Lee contrasts those seen as "upholding pro-Japanese sentiments" with leaders emphasizing Korea's wartime suffering, such as Kim Dae-Jung, who denounced pro-Japanese policies. 

He concluded by stressing, "Understanding these historical trajectories is vital for comprehending contemporary South Korea-Japan relations and the evolution of South Korean identity."

Exposing Inconsistencies

Lee Seok-choon's lecture on the comfort women illuminated the evolution of testimonies. He stressed, "Testimonies from comfort women have evolved over time, shaped by external pressures and societal expectations." Political agendas in South Korea "have often obscured nuanced historical narratives," he added. 

Citing a report by Media Watch, he highlighted the initial lack of allegations of forced mobilization by Japan in early testimonies, pointing out that they were later modified due to external influences. "Testimonies quoted at the time were constantly changing, adding more details," he reported. Lee also drew on Professor Park Yuha's findings, which underscored how testimonies were amplified to include accounts of coercion by the Imperial Japanese army.

Academic Freedom and Historical Truths

Mark Ramseyer's lecture on comfort women in American academia highlighted the interplay between historical discourse and academic liberty. Reflecting on his own experience, Ramseyer reveals, "Three years ago, I published a concise 8-page paper on comfort women-related issues, and I faced intense criticism." 

He identified one distinct group responsible for the backlash: Korean students studying in the United States. "They were keen on Korean history, specifically the comfort women topic, yet lacked genuine interest (in the truth)."

Ramseyer noted the significant presence of Korean students in American universities, underscoring clashes rooted in national pride. He critically assessed the academic landscape, noting that "The issue escalated with Japanese history experts joining the attacks," illustrating broader challenges when conflicting viewpoints encounter strong opposition. 

Ramseyer concluded with a call for steadfastness in scholarship, asserting, "Adhere to truth. Write only the truth. When confronted, never yield."

CCP Influence

Jason Morgan's lecture scrutinized Code Pink, a prominent left-wing activist organization based in the US. Morgan cited its collaboration with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), particularly highlighting their organized tours to sites linked to the comfort women issue. He argued, "Code Pink's tours to places such as the historical sites of comfort women in China are a deliberate attempt to manipulate public perception." Morgan underscored that these tours are meticulously crafted to advance narratives favorable to the CCP. 

According to Morgan, these initiatives form part of a broader CCP strategy to influence global discourse. They aim to distort historical truths surrounding sensitive topics like the comfort women issue.

From Zero to One

The event concluded with closing remarks from speakers who stressed the importance of unity and historical accuracy in addressing complex issues. 

Kunitoshi Matsuki emphasized the urgent need for reconciliation between Japan and South Korea. He urged, "Now is the time for unity, not discord." 

Professor Lee Wooyeon called for strengthened international solidarity through media and educational reforms. "We must overhaul educational curricula and foster global unity," he asserted. 

As Nishioka pointed out, "We've transitioned from zero to one," highlighting the significant progress achieved through cross-national cooperation on the issue.

RELATED:

• Comfort Women Issue Focus of Tokyo Symposium With Views from 3 Countries
• INTERVIEW | On the 'The Comfort Women Hoax' with Mark Ramseyer and Jason Morgan
• BOOK REVIEW | ‘Anti-Japan Tribalism: The Root of the Japan-Korea Crisis’ by Lee Young-hoon and others
  
  

Author: Daniel Manning