Thank You Letter to President Trump and President Xi

(Click here to read this article in Japanese.)

 

I am somewhat perplexed. Why do we rarely see in our media expressions of gratitude to President Xi Jinping and President Donald Trump?

 

On the contrary, many people complain about the fact that the world economy had started to cool down even before the spread of coronavirus, because of the trade war between the United States and China. I would like to ask them: would it have been better to enjoy an amicable atmosphere in the short term and later regret encountering a mighty China looming over the entire world? And, would you prefer to see such improvements in U.S.-China relations that may induce China to give Japan a cold stare? 

 

I recall there once was a term, “Japan passing.” And, it was only six years ago that President Xi shook hands with Prime Minister Abe without even looking at him. I, for one, am grateful to the two presidents for waking all of us up sooner, rather than later.

 

First, thanks go to President Xi. Deng Xiaoping’s famous message after Tiananmen was that China should keep a low profile until it becomes a real major power. In short, it was a policy “to conceal one’s strength and bide one’s time.” His successors in general honored this will.

 

President Xi, however, started off by trumpeting the Chinese Dream of 2049, One Belt One Road, China Manufacturing 2025, constructing military bases on islands in the South China Sea, and Chinese companies almost dominating 5G. In a nutshell, he himself rang the wake up calls and alarmed us all.

 

Of course, it was not for our sake. In order to meet mounting frustration among people caused by the phenomenal income disparity in a supposedly communist country, he had to stir nationalism while suppressing dissidents within.

 

Those who cherish Deng’s tiptoeing approach with hushed steps must be the ones who prefer to be deceived rather than to know the truth. Thirty years later, they would have found themselves to be the Rip van Winkle of the 21st century.

 

Next, thanks go to President Trump. Now there is a growing concern towards China on many fronts, including security and technology as well as economy. 

 

Many say that when they let China join the World Trade Organization in 2001, they expected China to become a more open and liberal society, but that they had been betrayed. Really? I would ask. It was clear from the beginning that an autocratic society would not become a liberal one simply by becoming an affluent country. The truth is that people did not perceive that China would be able to exploit the opportunity to this magnitude. They also believed that it was not possible to change China with pressure from outside.

 

They now say that it’s not only President Trump. Moderate Republicans as well as Democrats hold similar views. Even those Europeans who rushed to the  Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank several years ago echo the same tune. But only a few years ago, when Peter Navarro or Michael Pillsbury wrote about the threat of China, their views were treated as extreme. Engaging China was the thinking of mainstream China watchers.

 

True, former president Barack Obama, when advocating the Trans-Pacific Partnership, said we cannot have China as the rule-maker in the region. But it was President Trump who first squarely stood up against China. It was only for the sake of his country.

 

If the U.S. had taken a multilateral approach rather than going unilaterally, it would have been a lot more effective. Still, we should not lose sight of the fact that he was the first leader to take the alarm bell of President Xi so seriously. This is why I am saying that all of us should be more thankful to both President Xi and President Trump.

 

Before concluding, let me refer to possible changes in the two countries.

 

First, in the United States. Will the next U.S. president, if it is not Mr. Trump, continue this hardline policy towards China? Many answer affirmatively. But don’t forget two things. In an election year, every candidate is a hardliner. Also, a new administration always looks for something new. President Obama did not follow President Bush’s policies. President Trump toppled almost everything done by President Obama. 

 

We should be ready for the day when a new president searches for a “reset button.” In such a case, we should support it, but also remind him about the desirability of arms control negotiations with China. Because although a firm believer in interdependency and lasting friendship with China, I am concerned about its military buildup.

 

Second, China reportedly succeeded in taking control of the spread of coronavirus quicker than any other country. They are now extending a helping hand to other countries when Western countries are gasping for breath themselves. Impressive. It was as if a new leader-like China had emerged.

 

But when we heard a Chinese government press secretary and media claiming that China might not be the origin of the virus and the world should learn from China and be grateful to China, we realized that such leadership has not emerged yet. We found the same old self-righteous, never apologizing regime taking a tough stance when they have weakness.

 

Just as WTO has not changed Chinese governance, coronavirus has not changed Chinese mentality.

 

Author: Ichiro Fujisaki

Ichiro Fujisaki is president of Nakasone Peace Institute. He was ambassador of Japan to the United States (2008-2012).

 

Ichiro Fujisaki

Author:

Ambassador Ichiro Fujisaki is currently President of Nakasone Peace Institute and President of the America-Japan Society of Japan. As a Japanese diplomat he served as ambassador to the United States from 2008 to 2012. Before that he was Ambassador to the United Nations and to the World Trade Organization in Geneva, serving as the chairman of the Executive Committee of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. His other Ministry of Foreign Affairs posts include terms as deputy director-general for Asian Affairs and director-general for North American Affairs, before being appointed as the deputy foreign minister. He studied at Keio University, Brown University and Stanford Graduate School.

2 Comments

  • The Chinese and Koreans jointly worked to collapse the Olympics Tokyo 2020 games. The timing of the Wuhan virus arranged in such a way, it critically paralyses the Olympics Tokyo 2020.

    They might try the same scheme of things in a more sophisticated way to create hurdles for 2021 Olympics. What Japan is going to do, to safeguard the Olympics Tokyo 2021?

  • Hi from New York. I just wanted to comment about a few things. First, the author’s comment that “If the U.S. had taken a multilateral approach rather than going unilaterally, it would have been a lot more effective.” We already had that, with Obama. He took a multilateral approach to Iran. But the EU is weak, very weak — worse, many EU countries are selfishly dying to do business in/with Iran), so the US got a weak deal when we included the EU. Multilateral just didn’t work (you’re basically as strong as your weakest link). Trump was not going to repeat that with China – instead he used the US economy as the force it is. As an aside, and with all due respect and admiration for Tokyo and the Olympics Tokyo 2020 (see above comment), China was losing trade war to the US in front of the entire world – I think that’s far greater motivation to unleash a bio-weapon silently carried by civilian travelers, to the US and around the world. Second topic – “arms control negotiations with China” – even if China were to keep any such agreement (and that’s a big “if”), China and its military are huge!! The US needs to constantly develop high tech high power arms to balance, and combat if necessary, that threat. While another nation, like Russia, can continue to develop and arm itself, we could be prohibited from countering that threat due to a treaty with China. We already saw this happen with our mid-range hypersonic missile development in the US – China was ahead, because we were barred by a treaty with Russia. Just some food for thought – there are some good reasons why we are so bent on remaining independent.

Leave a Reply