Connect with us

Politics & Security

EDITORIAL | What are Russia and China Still Doing in the UN Security Council?

The number one reason for the existence of the United Nations is to preserve peace and security in the world, which Russia has trampled and China threatens.



Prime Minister Kishida speaks at the General Debate of the 77th United Nations General Assembly in New York on September 20, 2022 (Kyodo)

In his address to the United Nations General Assembly on September 20, Prime Minister Fumio Kishida declared that Russia's invasion of Ukraine had plunged the United Nations into a crisis of confidence. He announced that Japan was calling for serious reforms in the world body. 

As the Prime Minister rightly pointed out, the foremost reason for the loss of confidence in the UN had been Russia’s aggression against Ukraine. It was, in his characterization, “an act that tramples on the vision and principles of the UN Charter.” 

Paralyized UN Security Council

The Security Council has proven powerless in the face of the reckless violence of one of its permanent members. Indeed, the September 22 meeting of the Security Council quickly degenerated into an exchange of accusations. 

UN Security Council reform and the withdrawal of Russian troops from Ukraine are inseparable. It is essential that such reform be accomplished if we are to prevent another such war of aggression. 

Ambassador Vasily Nebenzya of Russia casts the lone dissenting vote in the United Nations Security Council, Friday, Feb. 25, 2022. (AP Photo/Seth Wenig, File)

Recovering Forgotten Ideals 

The number one reason for the existence of the United Nations is to preserve peace and security in the world. And that responsibility has been delegated to the Security Council. 

The five permanent members of the Security Council — the United States, the United Kingdom, Russia, France, and China — were the major victors in World War II. They were granted the special right to exercise a veto on Security Council resolutions. 

Expectations were that peace would be maintained through the constructive involvement of these five countries. 

To ensure this occurs, these five nations were expected to be aware of the gravity of their responsibilities and not shatter the peace themselves. That had been the basic premise upon which the current system was established. 


Overcoming the Shattered Trust

Nonetheless, the Russian government under President Vladimir Putin has violated this trust without batting an eye, vetoing a Security Council resolution condemning its aggression so as to lend a veneer of legitimacy to its invasion of Ukraine. 

In his speech to the General Assembly, US President Joe Biden criticized the Russian invasion as a “violation of the UN Charter.” Meanwhile, he emphasized the need for reform of the United Nations. He also urged self-restraint in the use of their veto power by permanent members of the Security Council.  

It is encouraging that the US, one of the five major powers, has taken a progressive stance on the subject of UN reform. Hopefully, it will cooperate with Japan, which in 2023 will begin a two-year term as a non-permanent Security Council member, in taking the lead to achieve reform. 

In the three decades since the end of the Cold War, resolutions have been repeatedly submitted to expand the ranks of the Security Council permanent membership through the addition of Japan and other major countries. Unfortunately, these proposals have failed to garner widespread support. 

However, the past is the past and the present situation is different. 

Chinese State Councilor and Foreign Minister Wang Yi speaking at the United Nations Headquarters in New York on September 24.(AP/Kyodo)

Disqualifying Aggressors

The most important point is that Russia's obvious disdain for the United Nations Charter means that it no longer should be considered qualified to serve as a member of the UN Security Council. 

In his video address to the UN General Assembly, Volodymyr Zelenskyy called for Russia to be stripped of its veto power. That certainly would be a key to reform. A mechanism is needed for punishing an aggressor, no matter what nation that might be. 

Nevertheless, in order to enact true reforms, we must always remain aware of the existence of China, which has exhibited a continuing pattern of ignoring international rules. We would have liked to see Prime Minister Kishida refer to the current severe situation in East Asia. 


(Read the editorial in Japanese at this link.)

Author: Editorial Board, The Sankei Shimbun


Our Partners